guilty.

v. (also adj., n.)
/ˈɡɪlt.i/
PRONOUNCED · WITHOUT APOLOGY
1.To drink at the table. 2.To know what you're doing. 3.To do it anyway.
This is a soda brand. We're going to sell you some soda. Here is the brand document we wrote to explain how.

guilty is "anti-pop soda" because pop is what other sodas do and we needed an angle. the strategy deck took months and cost more than the cans. we ran it past seventeen stakeholders. we are very proud.

the cans look like luxury fashion packaging because we benchmarked against jacquemus and aesop. there's nothing in them you can't find in other drinks. the difference is what they cost, what they look like, and how you'll feel holding one.

the brand world is "wellness state v. house of guilty" which is a courtroom drama about a soda. we put your wellness habits on trial because nobody else was. the bureau is fictional. the wellness state is not.

we made three flavours. citrus, blood orange ginger, spiced cola. they're good. you can also make all three at home with juice and some of that 'premium' sparkling water but you won't, because you are buying the can, the world, the joke.

the people in the case files don't exist. we made them with AI. every man with a whoop, every woman who sells discipline at 11pm, every traveller who logs the practice — composites of types we recognised. our drinks are real. our charges are real. the methodology is filed at /method.

we sell at venues because that's where people sit down together. retail is a fridge. a fridge is not a table. nobody was ever changed by a fridge.

we accept this may be funny. you're complicit too.

— The defence rests
Wellness State Bureau · Dept of Compliance · File 2026-A
Subject:
House of Guilty
Type:
Collective entity, soda manufacturer
Jurisdiction:
Melbourne, Victoria
Status:
Active. Operating openly. Refuses to comply.
On all counts.
Sentence: continued operation. No parole.
Verdict: GUILTY™
The accused appears only in venues where good taste is under investigation. Approach with caution. Do not attempt to debate. Sharing a can with a non-drinker may constitute aiding and abetting.

for trade

the defence rests. the invitation doesn't.

we stock direct, on-premise only — in rooms where the list is considered and the bartender can sell the third can without trying. if that's yours, file with us.

see who's already on the registry →